30 Seconds to Mars: A Beautiful Lie [Virgin, 2005]
At first, I had a hard time figuring out why I didn't like this much more than I actually did--there weren't any obvious, glaring flaws anywhere I could notice. Slick, dramatic, flashy, clean, with lots of action and plot turns all over the place--a little weird, maybe, but what else would you expect from a Hollywood actor who became a rock musician? But as I kept listening it became apparent that there are a couple issues here: first, the music clearly lacks gripping melodies of the sort needed to make melodic rock like this really great. Second, it is obvious that many people involved in this album had previous movie industry experience, given that they apparently dumped all the complex plot twists one would expect in a typical action movie into a blender. The result is all sorts of stylistic changes jumbled throughout the album--tempo shifts, quiet ballads suddenly changing to loud, pseudo-"crazy" rockers, everything. The problem is that the elements of what would be the "plot" on the big screen don't form any apparent "whole" that could be considered better or even equal to the sum of its parts, and the drama also makes it seem like they're trying to compensate for the lack of songwriting substance by turning the style and bombast up to 11. Not only that, but entertainment only goes so far when you're working entirely in the auditory realm, as here, rather than on the big screen. As a result, despite intermittent bits and pieces that do reach out and grip you (especially "The Kill (Bury Me)"), the album as a whole is ultimately hindered by hollow, lethargic, and aimless vibes-as though Leto were trying to act like a good musician rather than actually trying to be one. Or, to put it another way, it is as if he were trying to sing songs he pretended to care about rather than those he genuinely cared about, and could invest with a sincere and affecting meaning. B MINUS
30 Seconds to Mars: This Is War [Virgin/EMI, 2009]
There's still a certain vapidity in the background choruses sprinkled throughout these tracks, as there was on A Beautiful Lie, but Leto's songwriting skills seem to have improved a great deal in the four years since then. Perhaps the most obvious ways in which this has occurred is the improvement of these songs' melodies and timing compared to those on Lie. The title track and "Vox Populi" both seem to be pretty good examples of the band, intentionally or not, avoiding their past mistakes of throwing too many stylistic tricks (tempo/volume/etc. changes), and instead just trying to write songs that stand reasonably well without being "masked" by such tricks. The result is for the listener to be drawn into these songs significantly more than last time. Nevertheless, this album, like its predecessor, still seems to be hindered by an inherent limitation of the band's mainstream-yet-weird combination of classical orchestra backgrounds, anthemic pop rock, military themes, and to top it off, trying to convert all this into something profound and sublime. (I thought there was something more specific holding it back at first, but I couldn't figure out what it was.) Still, some of the over-the-top conceptual fight-against-the-oppressive-government stuff from last time has also been tweaked a bit, to make it less gloomy and more uplifting. This turns out to be a big improvement, because it turns out poppy, concept-laden arena-rock mixes much better with major keys than with minor ones. An enjoyable diversion--almost as much fun as a good action movie, though not in the same overarching way. B PLUS
Flobots: Fight With Tools [Universal Republic, 2008]
You've gotta admire the Flobots' willingness to throw in "everything and the kitchen sink" here, as AllMusic's David Jeffries noted in his review of this album. It contains varying amounts of "normal" rap, gentle, blue-eyed soul-esque background singers, jazz instrumentation, bits and pieces of spoken word, it's all there. Not only that, the optimism of Obama's 2008 campaign is unmistakable throughout this album, and the vocalists demonstrate remarkable verbal dexterity in conveying their political views in hip-hop form. All in all, the album certainly seems pretty well-made on the surface, with the instruments being played well and the songs written carefully and uniquely. All the lyrics and rhythms are highly complex in their arrangements, and they're arranged in the repetitive-but-not-too-repetitive manner of a band trying pro forma not to bore their audience too much, while also giving them hooks they can enjoy in each song. These guys, in short, clearly have no shortage of interesting ideas. It's also refreshing that they're so willing to push rap-rock away from RATM's political metal angle, and towards their own political jazz/rock fusion angle. But if Arrested Development have taught us anything, it's that otherwise good alternative hip hop can shoot itself in the foot by being too sanctimonious. These guys' pacifist messages seem relatable and engaging enough, but they seem to have fallen into the AD trap of being too sanctimonious, and of trying too hard to educate their audience, as exemplified by "Anne Braden", a tribute to a white Southern civil rights activist (featuring spoken word passages spoken by Braden herself!). This song provides a depressingly clear example of how carefully, sincerely, and virtuously written music can ultimately be hindered by a combination of sententiousness and didactism. Not only that, but their ideas are so numerous and variegated that they end up being disorienting, as if one was on a roller coaster pulling and pushing you in so many different directions it limits one's ability to enjoy what you're trying to. In short, when you think an album's lyricists would be better at being community organizers instead, there's a problem. Still, there's no need to write this album off entirely, as it contains more impressive displays of flexibility and creativity than most circus acts. B MINUS
Wednesday, December 27, 2017
Tuesday, November 14, 2017
My own reviews
I have decided to review albums myself that Christgau has, for whatever reason, not reviewed. The albums I'm going to focus on are those that you'd think he'd have reviewed given how successful and well-known they are, but that he hasn't (and probably never will). To avoid albums he might review in the future I'm limiting myself to ones released at least five years ago (i.e. 2012 or earlier), but still recently enough that I am familiar with them already. In many cases these albums are those I have been at least a little familiar with for many years, e.g. because I heard one song from it on the radio many times growing up, or remember seeing it when it was just released on iTunes.
I'll start with this review I've been sitting on for a while already:
Arctic Monkeys: Suck it and See (Domino, 2011) On the heels of Humbug comes another album that is clearly less upbeat and fun than the Monkeys' early albums. But that's not to say it's no different from the notoriously dark Humbug--this one gets off to a noticeably more positive start. Importantly, this demonstrates that Alex Turner is now better at breaking out of his funk than he was an album ago. Why is this important? Because his addition of a dash of positivity and high speed to the pensive and bizarre lyrics of Humbug helps cancel out the major problem with the latter--namely, that it wallowed too much in its own slow-burning depression to go anywhere. Take "Library Pictures", which, though it is in a minor key, is clearly faster, louder, and more upbeat than anything on Humbug--except in the (relatively) slow bridge. The fun the band has from singing about specific subjects is clearly here when it was lacking in Humbug, and this translates into more fun for the listener as well, rendering each track significantly more engaging and interesting listening. This is never more apparent than on the title track, with its upbeat chorus and clear human object of affection who nevertheless appears, by her face, to have been "made to break your heart". In short, if Humbug was the valley, this one is the plateau at which you arrive after making it out of the valley. B+
I'll start with this review I've been sitting on for a while already:
Arctic Monkeys: Suck it and See (Domino, 2011) On the heels of Humbug comes another album that is clearly less upbeat and fun than the Monkeys' early albums. But that's not to say it's no different from the notoriously dark Humbug--this one gets off to a noticeably more positive start. Importantly, this demonstrates that Alex Turner is now better at breaking out of his funk than he was an album ago. Why is this important? Because his addition of a dash of positivity and high speed to the pensive and bizarre lyrics of Humbug helps cancel out the major problem with the latter--namely, that it wallowed too much in its own slow-burning depression to go anywhere. Take "Library Pictures", which, though it is in a minor key, is clearly faster, louder, and more upbeat than anything on Humbug--except in the (relatively) slow bridge. The fun the band has from singing about specific subjects is clearly here when it was lacking in Humbug, and this translates into more fun for the listener as well, rendering each track significantly more engaging and interesting listening. This is never more apparent than on the title track, with its upbeat chorus and clear human object of affection who nevertheless appears, by her face, to have been "made to break your heart". In short, if Humbug was the valley, this one is the plateau at which you arrive after making it out of the valley. B+
Saturday, April 22, 2017
How often does he change his grades?
It is evident to anyone who has read enough of Christgau's old CG columns that he sometimes changes the grades he gives albums. Albums he has changed the grade of from when he first reviewed it in a column can be identified by the "[Later: (new grade)]" displayed after the old review on the column page. For instance, this column shows that he originally gave Icky Mettle, the Archers of Loaf's debut album, an A- grade, but that he later raised this to an A. So I wondered, how often does he change grades of albums like this? I'll only look at 1990-1997 because I don't feel like looking back earlier, or further, than that.
I'm also not counting when a "dud" grade is changed to a letter grade lower than B+.
1990: 19/367
1991: 14/402
1992: 12/373 (incl. American Music Club's Everclear, which is not marked as changed (NMAC))
1993: 16/445 (incl. J.'s We are the Majority (NMAC))
1994: 15/462 (incl. Ass Ponys' Grim (NMAC))
1995: 19/430
1996: 15/463
1997: 9/450 (incl. Fountains of Wayne's self-titled album (NMAC))
So we see that he doesn't change his grades very often--during the time period, he never changed so much as 5% of his reviews in a given year. The most he changed in one year was in 1990 and in 1995, when he changed 19 reviews in each year. (But he changed a higher % in 1990 because he reviewed fewer albums that year).
"Silent" CC changes: when the grade (Choice cuts) itself doesn't change but the tracks selected as CCs do. Examples:
1. Yo La Tengo's Fakebook originally had "Barnaby, Hardly Waiting" and "Emulsified" as choice cuts. But he later replaced "Barnaby, Hardly Waiting" with "Speeding Motorcycle" and "The Summer".
2. John Forster's Entering Marion originally included "Whole" as a choice cut, but it was later removed.
3. Todd Snider's Songs for the Daily Planet originally included "Alright Guy" as a choice cut, but it was later removed as well.
4. Will Smith's Big Willie Style originally only listed "Gettin' Jiggy With It" as a choice cut, but he later added "Just the Two of Us" and "Miami".
5. Black Sheep's A Wolf in Sheep's Clothing originally only listed "U Mean I'm Not" as a choice cut, but "The Choice is Yours" was later added.
I'm also not counting when a "dud" grade is changed to a letter grade lower than B+.
1990: 19/367
1991: 14/402
1992: 12/373 (incl. American Music Club's Everclear, which is not marked as changed (NMAC))
1993: 16/445 (incl. J.'s We are the Majority (NMAC))
1994: 15/462 (incl. Ass Ponys' Grim (NMAC))
1995: 19/430
1996: 15/463
1997: 9/450 (incl. Fountains of Wayne's self-titled album (NMAC))
So we see that he doesn't change his grades very often--during the time period, he never changed so much as 5% of his reviews in a given year. The most he changed in one year was in 1990 and in 1995, when he changed 19 reviews in each year. (But he changed a higher % in 1990 because he reviewed fewer albums that year).
"Silent" CC changes: when the grade (Choice cuts) itself doesn't change but the tracks selected as CCs do. Examples:
1. Yo La Tengo's Fakebook originally had "Barnaby, Hardly Waiting" and "Emulsified" as choice cuts. But he later replaced "Barnaby, Hardly Waiting" with "Speeding Motorcycle" and "The Summer".
2. John Forster's Entering Marion originally included "Whole" as a choice cut, but it was later removed.
3. Todd Snider's Songs for the Daily Planet originally included "Alright Guy" as a choice cut, but it was later removed as well.
4. Will Smith's Big Willie Style originally only listed "Gettin' Jiggy With It" as a choice cut, but he later added "Just the Two of Us" and "Miami".
5. Black Sheep's A Wolf in Sheep's Clothing originally only listed "U Mean I'm Not" as a choice cut, but "The Choice is Yours" was later added.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)